Rolling Contact Fatigue (Spalling)

modo_falhaISO 14224: BE-FATFw A · wear_outFw B · cbm (P-F/2 (monthly route; continuous on critical assets))
Suggest a correction

What it is. Every rolling bearing converts sliding into rolling — but the price of that efficiency is that the entire load passes through contact areas the size of a fingernail, generating enormous compressive pressures (1.5 to 3+ GPa), well above the yield strength of ordinary steel. The material only survives because the stress is compressive, confined and cyclic — every revolution is another stress cycle beneath the surface. After millions to billions of such cycles, microcracks form below the surface (at microscopic inclusions in the steel), grow slowly, and eventually reach the surface: a piece of metal breaks loose, leaving a crater — the spall. This is the bearing's natural wear-out death, and the reason no bearing lasts "forever."

How to recognize it in the field. Rising vibration at specific frequencies (the so-called BPFO/BPFI/BSF — each tied to a different part of the bearing), rhythmic metallic noise that worsens over time, and — at an advanced stage — elevated temperature and audible noise. The good news: this process is slow and progressive, giving weeks to months of warning before functional failure — enough time to plan the replacement instead of an unplanned stoppage.

What it costs if left untreated. A bearing that sheds a large spall can seize, generate extreme heat and damage the surrounding shaft and housing — a foreseeable maintenance issue turns into an expensive unplanned outage. The right strategy here is not fixed-interval replacement (real life varies widely bearing to bearing, even identical ones) — it is condition monitoring, replacing when the signal appears.

Framework A — Diagnosis

How the failure behaves over time (Nowlan & Heap)

Category
Wear-out
Weibull β
1.1–1.5 (classic Hertzian contact fatigue)

Framework B — Prescription

Applicable and effective task (SAE JA1011 / Moubray)

Decision
CBM
Periodicity
P-F/2 (monthly route; continuous on critical assets)
Detectable P-F
Yes
Evident failure
Yes
Typical P-F
weeks to a few months between the first envelope/BPFx signal and functional failure — Tallian, Failure Atlas

Maintenance plan

FAILURE-MODE FOCUS: This plan exists to combat specifically the failure mode "Rolling Contact Fatigue (Spalling)" on "Rolling Bearing". In the RELIABILITAS methodology (Framework A → Framework B), a periodic maintenance plan is only technically valid for failure modes with a TBM or CBM decision. For random failures without a detectable P-F, hidden failures or infant mortality, a periodic plan makes NO sense — the correct answer is another one (RTF + spares management, proof test, assembly quality control). The classification grounding this plan is in section 1.

TaskMethodAcceptance criterionPeriodicity
Monitor vibration spectrum/envelope at the defect frequencies (BPFO/BPFI/BSF)Boundary condition: In operation, stable load and speed — record actual RPM (not nameplate) to compute the correct defect frequenciesEnvelope (high-frequency demodulation) + conventional spectrum; compare amplitude and harmonic count against the healthy-machine baselineNo BPFO/BPFI/BSF above baseline; no month-over-month growth in harmonics or sidebandsEmerging BPFx → increase route frequency and start replacement planning; multiple harmonics + sidebands → advanced stage, prioritize replacement at the next outageMonthly (P-F/2); continuous on critical assets
Check housing/bearing temperature trendBoundary condition: In operation, stable load for at least 30 minSpot thermography or fixed sensor; compare with history at an equivalent load conditionTemperature stable within ±5 °C of baseline at the same load conditionSustained rise with no process explanation → correlate with vibration; reinforced suspicion of an advanced stageAlongside the vibration route

Local graph

Rolling Contact Fat…CavitationLubricant Contamina…Lubrication Failure…False Brinelling (S…Rolling BearingIncorrect Mounting …
Sources8

Standards and institutes

  • ISO 15243:2017 — Rolling bearings: damage and failures — terms, characteristics and causes, §5.1
  • ISO 281:2007 — Rolling bearings: dynamic load ratings and rating life

Technical literature

  • Harris & Kotzalas — Rolling Bearing Analysis, 5th ed., ch. 24 (contact fatigue)
  • Tallian — Failure Atlas for Hertz Contact Machine Elements, 2nd ed. (1999, ASME Press)
  • Moubray, RCM II (1997), ch. 7 — predictive tasks and P-F interval

Papers and reports

  • Lundberg & Palmgren (1947) — Dynamic Capacity of Rolling Bearings, Acta Polytechnica

Other

  • SKF Evolution — Bearing damage analysis with ISO 15243
  • Machine Design — The Meaning of Bearing Life (L10 vs MTBF)

Reviewed on 2026-07-18

Referenced by